Considering the book’s ending, Tony’s final rejection of Susan might also be costing him his life - but it’s the only choice he has. (Ergo, fashion, if we’re going full psychoanalyst here.) After all, in the book Tony’s doppelgänger loses everything twice over: His family is taken from him, and his pursuit of revenge costs him his life. (Does he also represent, for the sophomore director, the virtues and opportunities of cinema? Maybe!) Susan, then, signifies the empty promise of luxury for its own sake. For Ford, Tony seems to represent integrity, a person seeking truth and finding it at great cost. On one hand, it’s a childish thing to do, rubbing her face in her own attraction on the other, it’s the ultimate rejection of what he represents to her. Tony ghosts on Susan at their planned meeting, forcing her to confront her own superficiality, how easily she’s won back. As an artist, Tony’s work turns out to be disturbing and affecting, seducing Susan all over again with what seems to be the only grain of truth in her life. The art world is often criticized for celebrating subversion for subversion’s sake, but here, in light of her ex-husband’s descent into hell, these images take on actual meaning. And as Susan falls deeper into Tony’s novel, these images keep appearing: an animal pierced by arrows a painting on the wall that says “REVENGE” an apparition appearing in a colleague’s cell phone. The movie’s first scene takes place at a gallery opening, where naked obese women dance around on video, a layered misogyny she seems, at most, ambivalent about. Meanwhile, as Susan becomes transfixed by the book, we see a strange mirroring of its violence in the world around her. After the breakup, Tony writes the novel he could never manage when he was with Susan, full of the type of vicious, aggressive action she seemed to be encouraging him toward. ![]() She leaves him for Hutton Morrow, the kind of stone-hewn alpha male who could only be played by Armie Hammer. They meet as students, but divorce when Susan finds herself exhausted by Tony’s sensitivity, the thing that drew her to him in the first place. ![]() First, we have to go back to the beginning, and end, of Tony and Susan’s relationship. It’s in Susan’s narrative that you can begin to suss out the complexity of the plot, which all dovetails in that ending. (Ironically, a common criticism of Ford’s own work.) Tony’s novel is pitch-black and disturbing, and Susan’s real life is aesthetically beautiful but devoid of substance, an empty exercise in wealth and beauty. On the surface, Nocturnal Animals plays as a thriller in the Sam Peckinpah mold, a brutal allegory about the worst natures of men, mostly because of the story-within-the-story. So, what the hell’s going on here? Is this all just a joke on poor Amy Adams? Why did Tony dedicate the book to her? ![]() Jake Gyllenhaal Hears the Truth About His Nocturnal Animals Characterīut it’s not that much more depressing than that the ending of Nocturnal Animals, the movie, which closes on Adams’s Susan, sitting at an opulent Los Angeles restaurant, finishing off her second expensive cocktail, waiting for Tony to arrive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |